Which practice strengthens your argument when analyzing a text?

Which practice strengthens your argument when analyzing a text?

• A. Cite general impressions
• B. Cite specific lines or data from the text
• C. Rely on personal beliefs
• D. Ignore quotes

Answer: (B)

When you analyze a text, a strong argument rests on evidence drawn directly from the text. Citing specific lines or data provides exact support for your claim, shows you read closely, and lets readers see how the text itself backs your interpretation. Quoting or referring to precise words, figures, or moments helps you explain how particular language or details connect to your point, making your reasoning clear and verifiable. Impressions without textual backing are subjective and hard to defend, and relying on personal beliefs isn’t tied to what the text actually says. Ignoring quotes removes the essential link between your argument and the source, leaving a claim that’s less persuasive.

When you analyze a text, a strong argument rests on evidence drawn directly from the text. Citing specific lines or data provides exact support for your claim, shows you read closely, and lets readers see how the text itself backs your interpretation. Quoting or referring to precise words, figures, or moments helps you explain how particular language or details connect to your point, making your reasoning clear and verifiable.

Impressions without textual backing are subjective and hard to defend, and relying on personal beliefs isn’t tied to what the text actually says. Ignoring quotes removes the essential link between your argument and the source, leaving a claim that’s less persuasive.